Anti-static gloves are one of those categories where the cheap version and the real version look identical and behave completely differently - and the difference only shows up when a customer's expensive circuit board dies. Here is how ESD gloves actually work, the standard that matters (EN 16350, not the marketing words), and how to source them so the conductivity is real and measurable rather than a hopeful claim on the polybag.
Anti-Static Is Not One Thing - Know Which You Need
The term anti-static covers two genuinely different requirements, and buyers conflate them constantly. Electronics assembly buyers need ESD-control gloves: gloves that safely dissipate static charge from the wearer so a handled component is not zapped, which means the glove must be electrically conductive enough to drain charge to a grounded wrist or floor. Other buyers want anti-static in a flammable atmosphere - petrochemical, grain handling - where the concern is a spark, and that is governed by EN 16350. They are related but the test thresholds differ. The first question on any anti-static enquiry is: are you protecting a sensitive component, or preventing an ignition spark? The answer changes the build and the certificate.
How a Conductive Glove Is Actually Made
Conductivity comes from carbon fibre or conductive (carbon-coated or metal-core) filaments knitted into the glove at intervals - the familiar grey or black stripe pattern through a nylon or polyester liner. The carbon creates a path that lets charge bleed away instead of building up. The volume of conductive fibre and how evenly it is distributed determines the resistance, and that is exactly what cheap suppliers skimp on - too little carbon fibre, unevenly knitted, and the resistance is out of spec in patches you cannot see. A PU palm coating is then usually added for grip and to keep particles down. The conductive yarn costs more and the knitting is fussier, which is the whole reason the genuine article costs more.
EN 16350 and the Number That Matters
EN 16350 is the European standard for electrostatic properties of protective gloves, and it sets a vertical resistance threshold - the glove must have a through-resistance below 1.0 x 10^8 ohms to pass. That single number is what you should be buying against. Ask the supplier for the EN 16350 test report, and note the critical subtlety: EN 16350 is tested at a defined humidity, and many gloves that pass at lab humidity drift out of spec in a very dry winter cleanroom. For electronics ESD work, buyers often also reference resistance ranges from ANSI/ESD S20.20 programmes. Put the target resistance range on your spec sheet explicitly - do not accept anti-static as a description without a number behind it.
Why the Cheap Ones Fail Silently
This is the category where corner-cutting is most dangerous to your customer, because failure is invisible. A glove with too little conductive fibre still looks grey-striped, still feels right, and still passes a casual look - but its resistance is too high to actually drain charge, so it provides false confidence while components quietly take ESD damage that may only show up as field failures weeks later. There is no visual tell. The only defence is a test report tied to your production lot, not a generic certificate for a different batch shown once during sampling. We tie the EN 16350 report to the production lot and will re-test on request, because in this category a generic certificate is close to meaningless.
Cleanroom and Particle Considerations
Many ESD buyers are also cleanroom buyers, and then a second axis appears: particle generation and packaging. A glove for a class-controlled environment should be low-linting, often washed and packed in a controlled way, sometimes individually bagged. Carbon-fibre liners can shed if cheaply made, which is the opposite of what a cleanroom wants. If your end use is a cleanroom, say so up front - it changes the liner choice, the coating, and the packaging, and it is not a spec you can bolt on after the fact. For disposable cleanroom work the conversation shifts toward nitrile, which is a different product line - see our private-label nitrile guide.
MOQ, Pricing and Branding
ESD/anti-static knitted gloves with PU palm coating run from 500 pairs MOQ, FOB Ningbo roughly USD 0.70 to 2.20 depending on conductive-fibre content, coating, and whether an EN 16350 lot report is required. Branding is constrained: a large dark print or heavy embroidery on the back can interfere with the look and, more importantly, buyers in this category usually want minimal contamination, so we keep logos to a small cuff print or a printed cuff band. Most ESD buyers care far more about the test report and lot traceability than about decoration, so do not over-invest in branding here - invest in the certificate.
How to Brief and Vet an ESD Supplier
Brief it like a technical spec, not a fashion item: state whether it is ESD-control (component protection) or anti-static (spark prevention), the target resistance range or EN 16350 pass requirement, the environment (cleanroom class if any), the operating humidity, and the wash expectation. Then vet hard: ask for an EN 16350 report tied to a recent lot, ask whether they re-test per production batch, and send a deliberately technical question to gauge whether they understand resistance ranges or just repeat the words. A supplier who treats anti-static as a marketing label rather than a measured property is one to avoid - the same vetting discipline applies, just with a meter.
Our Honest Position on ESD Gloves
We knit carbon-fibre conductive liners with PU palm coating and test to EN 16350 with the report tied to the production lot, and we will re-test on request because we know a generic certificate proves nothing about your pallet. We are honest about the two meanings of anti-static and will ask which one you need before quoting. Where the application is a true cleanroom, we will tell you frankly whether a knitted ESD glove or a disposable cleanroom nitrile is the right answer rather than pushing the one we happen to make. In a category where failure is invisible and expensive, the test report is the product - and that is exactly how we sell it.
Want a Second Opinion on Your Tech Pack?
We review around 8-12 tech packs a week from buyers comparing factories. Free, no obligation - we will flag construction issues, suggest fabric alternatives, and tell you if a quote you got elsewhere is realistic.
This guide is updated when industry conditions change - the last revision was based on Q1 2026 fabric pricing and CN-EU freight rates.